The PWL Jackpot: Knox Elementary School Principal and Underage Porn Scandal

(Discuss this post here: http://pornwikileaks.com/forum/showthread.php?p=75999)

Porn Wiki Leaks no doubt has a plethora of scandals waiting to be revealed in the real name databases over time.

The lawyer who liked to fuck porn whores? The former gay porn actors? The prom queen? The former classmates? The politicians? The “upstanding citizens” with their porno past? The school teachers? The elementary school principal?

And the underage girls.

It’s inevitable that as the real names of performers are revealed, that a few underage performers who were allowed to work in porn valley will be revealed.

PWL just might have its first underage porn scandal currently unfolding.

Either that or the claims of the girl being underage at the time of her performance is a lame attempt to try to force PWL to remove the name?

We HAVE been running into these type of geniuses lately!

How NOT to get your name deleted

We at PWL feel it is very important to protect minors and if a minor has been filmed law enforcement needs to be notified and the porn scumbags that hired her need to be exposed.

The scenes must be removed from the internet and parties involved need to be dealt with by law enforcement including the child which may have provided a fake ID in this case.

WARNING: Being an "Attention Whore" can be hazardous to your health

So here is the story that is unfolding as we speak:

We had a person contact us to have their name removed claiming they were only 16 when they made 2 movies and then the mother started contacting us and threatening us. After tons of emails back and forth trying to get to the bottom of who, and what company made these movies, and what the models DOB is, it turns out that the mother is as stupid of a whore as the daughter is, and is lying and trying to commit more crimes and cover up the crime instead of dealing with it the right way.

She could have just given us the info so the companies may remove the child porn where ever it might be and law enforcement can be contacted.

We tried really hard to get the info so the proper channels can be notified and the content can be removed from the internet but as of right now we just have a mother and daughter admitting to the crime and covering it up and lying about it later.

They are choosing to hide this so the child porn stays up online.

Note that “if” this content even exists that none of this content has anything to do with pornwikileaks.com and is not displayed anywhere on our site.

The only thing on our site is a girls real name.  We are still not sure these people are telling the truth. In fact, when people start lying you have to question everything they say.

Rule #1: WHORES LIE!

If we knew where on the web this supposed underage content was we would be able to report it.

Maybe our members can figure this one out with her names?

Here are the emails below.

First email from daughter:

“Department: General

Message: please take me off your website i dont do porn and i desperately took part in two videos two years ago i am a completely different person now and i dont want this to jepordize my future please take me off i dont want this and thats why i stopped doing it two yeats ago!”

Second email from daughter:

“please take me off your website i had no idea what i was getting myself into and regret ever thinking making out with a naked girl was worth the money i havent done anything in two years but go back to school stop using drugs and work.i cant have this jepordize my future please take me off your website! i will pay you if need be this is horrible i only did it twice and now im on fuckin google with my full name!

Sincerly, Audrianna Maestas”

First email from mother:

“Department: Violations

Message:Your claim of Audrianna Maestas as Isabel Spigat is in violation of her rights. She was under the age of 18, and you are directly violating the law regarding child pornograpy. This is your first notice to remove any and all mentions of Audrianna Maestas and or any other name that is NOT to be attached.

Second email from mother:

“That is my understanding. She was told that she was going to do a “modeling” gig, a girl approached her at a Rave.


“The girl was suppose to pick her up, instead a man showed up and picked her up, and instead of going to “the office” he took her back to his house and starting playing pornography. She was scared and unfortunately under the influence of drugs and alcohol. She was stuck out in Orange County on drugs in a mans house and scared for her safety. I am her mother. My name is Kathryn Rollins. She has now been clean and sober for over two years a full time college student, and working at my husbands elementary school . He is principal there.

"Elementary, my dear Watson."

“She also volunteers at our church. The statement on the site is horrific and not accurate, and of course against the law since she was a minor at the time. We did not find out about this until just recently, the whole incident. I don’t know what her rights are. Will be obtaining an attorney moving forward. Literally a person can type in google…

Google "We promise not to cum in your mouth"

“…put her first and last name and up pops your site claiming she is a whore and pornographic slut. This is unacceptable. Please, remove this information.

Thank You, Kathryn Rollins

Third email from mother:

“Is there a supervisor, or manager of this site I can call? My daughter said that my communication with you was posted is that correct? Why would that be? Is our communication regarding a possible violation of the law be posted on the internet? I am happy to provide as much information as I can to help stop people approaching children. But further postings degrading her, and inappropriate posts on the validity of this issue is very irresponsible. I gave you my first and last name. You are not allowed to use my information, my first and last name, i.e. to post on your website, I am not in the porn industry and never will be. She does not have a pimp for god sake, and yes a parent is trying to clear this up. Please help me resolve this issue directly.

Thank You”

Fourth email from mother:

“I will speak to a live person and will not be sending sensitive information over the internet. I need a contact number and supervisors name please. How old she is now is not in question.

[Note from moderators: OK NOW IS WHERE SHE TRIES TO BACK TRACK AND CHANGE HER STORY ABOUT HER DAUGHTERS AGE. WE ONLY SAID TO HER IT WAS POSSIBLE HER DAUGHTER HAD AN AIM TEST BECAUSE OF THE RUMORS OF THE NAME LEAK COMING FROM AIM.]

Fifth email from mother:

“How old are you? I feel like I am talking to a child. I did not say you had child pornography on your site. Lying about what? You don’t live in my house. It was a huge incident about her not being 18, going to a Rave, how dangerous it was, and her disappearing for over 3 weeks to go to that damn thing. So yes, I know for a fact she was 17 at that rave. I will acknowledge I need to find out if she was indeed 17 still when she did the two scenes.


“I will find out who the right people are to contact for the possible underage violation. She is one tiny person in this world and your push to keep a statement insulting a young girl, with no facts, on the internet is mind blowing. I’m getting a feeling this is not a company, it is a bunch of young people in their homes, purchasing information from either health clinics and or some other means, and if its from health clinics, I will be looking into that one… you or someone else replied to me stating that you “know” she had some sort of HIV test, I would assume this type of test is only for this industry, how would you know that? Or does porn names/actual names have some list of some sort that identifys they had the test, but wont give any other information, for disclouse of porn stars to continue doing more movies, but doesnt give out any more information than that… I will definately be looking into this. I need a supervisor’s name and contact information/phone. What is your name and contact information? “

Sixth email from mother:

Yawn

“Can you please direct me to the person who is in the position to give me more information. The statement says she is a pornographic whore and slut. Can you prove that is what she is? Imagine it was you and your child? You have no movie, scene and or any other information? This is her future her life. Its inhumane.”

Seventh email from mother:

“Thank you for your time. You were advised of a possible minor being exploited on your site. And if your company is okay with that liablitly moving forward it is your choice. Your choice of industry, that you still participate in, does not make you any better.

Eighth email from mother:

“I didnt make any threats?? This happened a long time ago, that was already established. Or so I thought. The question was, at the time of the scenes was she 18 or not. It doesnt matter how old she is now, if at the time she was underage it is illegal. And any production and or solicitation or her, regarding a pornographic film at that time, while she was underage is illegal. Why are you insulting her? This is a business sir, right… so why are you not acting professional? I will do my due dillgence to get all this information. I am at a loss, just as you are on how to find this information. I have no idea why you would want this possible liability for your company. Makes no sense. That is not a threat, it is a commen sense statement.”

Ninth email from mother:

“Your a news site??

PWL is an "Equal Opportunist" exploiter

“Then you should know that you cannot post information without verifying its validity. Or reap legal consequences. NO that was not a threat, its the truth in general. She is not a hooker and or a whore. She is not in the porn industry. A couple of hours spent in one day, a horrible mistake, does not define who she is. We ALL would be in trouble if that was the case. She is my daughter, I am in complete shock with this information, and I’m dealing with a company representative who is calling my daughter a whore. Then, in the next breath is wanting me to give her birthdate, personal information, and links to a porn site and or company that exploited her. It is all very overwhelming. I am trying to find out the truth. There is no content to pull down, only a horrible mean spirited statement about a girl named Audrianna Maestas…and a porn name. Which is damaging enough. She is willing to take on any legal consequences of doing these scenes underage, if indeed she was. I support her decision. I just found all this out, I am still in the discovery phase, and dealing with your company at the same time.”

Tenth email from mother: [Still refusing to give the DOB – moderator]

“How many people am I talking to? I’m not being smart butt, really… I get one person in a email from your company calling my daughter a whore, and then in another message someone asking for her DOB.”

We decided to post the info on the forums and see what our members can find out.

After a few random posts by members we receive this post:

“There is no child porn.

Underage?

“It has been established. I have contacted all the proper people and have the names of everyone involved. Why do I have to disclose what action I have taken to a porn site? Why do I have to clear what I have discovered with your site and people on the internet. This is a private matter. You just want her information so you can sell it to people, not to help clear up a possible child porn issue. Your lying. You cut and pasted some of the emails to better fit what you wanted to say. Be honest to your readers. You lead them to the direction and assumptions you want to them perceive. You should give them more credit to make up their own minds. You posted my first and last name, but on your site you states you only put in information regarding the “whore” your dealing with and have no problem removing names of people not involved. I didnt do a movie, all I asked was for you to remove her name, at the time I understood she could of possibly could of been underage. Your site had her first and last name having with degrading statements. Then when I wouldnt give you her personal information, you told me I better do what you told me or you would put more things on the internet. That is blackmail my friend. Anyone on your site should be weary of participating in anything on this site because anyone is fair game for your abuse.”

Then someone else posted this:

“Funny to see the families of these whores and what they do for a living.

Is this your husband Principal
Garry Rollins?????????


http://pornwikileaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=50762

and is this you?

http://www.plumblines.net/

Her http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kathryn-rollins/6/989/5bb
Kathryn Rollins”

Now the “e-lawyer” threats begin:

“I told you that you were not allowed to use any of our email communications, which includes any and all information that was included i.e my name. That you were not allowed to publically post our discussions. From the first email commuication to the last.

Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521

Please remove immediately.”

And another:

“Bad idea putting up a school district website…that should be taken down, its your site, your in control of content

22576. An operator of a commercial Web site or online service that
collects personally identifiable information through the Web site or
online service from individual consumers who use or visit the
commercial Web site or online service and who reside in California
shall be in violation of this section if the operator fails to comply
with the provisions of Section 22575 or with the provisions of its
posted privacy policy in either of the following ways:
(a) Knowingly and willfully.
(b) Negligently and materially.

22577. For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions
apply:
(a) The term “personally identifiable information” means
individually identifiable information about an individual consumer
collected online by the operator from that individual and maintained
by the operator in an accessible form, including any of the
following:
(1) A first and last name.
(2) A home or other physical address, including street name and
name of a city or town.
(3) An e-mail address.
(4) A telephone number.
(5) A social security number.
(6) Any other identifier that permits the physical or online
contacting of a specific individual.
(7) Information concerning a user that the Web site or online
service collects online from the user and maintains in personally
identifiable form in combination with an identifier described in this
subdivision.”

And more backtracking:

“The site administrator used selective postings and editing. I was nice and respectful the entire time. Even ignored him when he called me a “whore like my daughter”. MY HUSBAND AND I DID NOT DO PORN. WE HAVE NO CONSEQUENCES OF DOING PORN BECAUSE WE DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG and or participate in pornographic films. I sent the site a email letting them know that they were not allowed to use MY name. It would be great if they took off her name…. But that has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY HUSBAND OR I. THE SITE ALLOWED FOR A SCHOOL DISTRICT WEB LINK to be posted on a porn site. There is no false threats, other than reacting to an individual who is saying do what I tell you, give me information about your child ,or I will post for the world to see. How can that be legal?? Why is my first and last name/personal information allowed to be on the site? A SCHOOL DISTRICT LINK is being allowed to be posted in an inapproriate way. The site has full control to remove any content. He could of used my first name and last INITIAL, and put this all on blast. But allowing a school website to be posted. He has editing power, obviously since he only puts excerpts of our emails. He got pissed at me for not doing what he wanted and posted MY name etc?? malicious intent, no other reason.

I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT ANY INFORMTION POSTED ON THIS SITE BY THE ADMINISTRATORS AND ITS USERS REGARDING MYSELF OR MY HUSBAND BE REMOVED. WE ARE NOT IN THE PORN INDUSTRY AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HER CHOICE TO DO A PORN MOVIE

Shall we call you Suzy?

I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT ANY INFORMATION POSTED ON THIS SITE BY THE ADMINISTRATORS AND ITS USERS REGARDING ADRIANNA MAESTAS BE REMOVED OUT OF COURTESY AND RESPECT FOR HER PRIVACY.

-Mrs. Rollins”

Now she’s begging and trying to be nice:

“Please stop. Why are you doing this? Great your not in California, no laws apply to you… common decency would be nice. I’m begging you, please remove any content with my information and any reference to my husband. We did nothing wrong. We are not in the porn industry. There is nothing to expose on us with the porn industry. I trusted you to help me. I gave you my real name so that we could work together and get to the bottom of things. I needed to speak to someone directly, your refused to provide me with a contact number. Of course I didnt want to send it email. Look what you are doing to myself and my husband. When you felt you were not getting the information fast enough you started to call me a whore. PLEASE HELP ME. PLEASE REMOVE AT LEAST MY HUSBANDS AND MY INFORMATION. AT LEAST.”

Then one of our administrators, worstnightmare, chimes in:

“From our FAQ: http://pornwikileaks.com/faq.html

Q. What is pornwikileaks?

A. “PORNWIKILEAKS is a web based media organization that is currently in it’s beginning stages of development. It’s one part pornography, one part shock media, one part wikileaks expose’, and one part parody.”

Dear Mrs. Rollins,

Please read the above info from our FAQ. Unfortunately, you have hit the PWL jackpot as your story is firing on all four of our PWL media cylinders!

Allow me to explain:

Pornography – Your daughter did porn after running away from home for three weeks possibly while underage.

Shock media – Your daughter’s father is the Principal of a well known elementary school in San Diego.

Wiki Leaks expose’ – How did your daughter get past the front door of the scumbag porn industry? Did she use a fake ID or did the producer wave her past because she was young and beautiful? HOW OFTEN DOES THIS HAPPEN IN PORN VALLEY THAT AN UNDERAGE GIRL IS ALLOWED IN A PORN MOVIE?

Parody – YOU informing us of these facts and then attempting to cover it up and threatening PWL with e-lawyer bs is some real funny shit! Our fans live for this stuff! Hollywood couldn’t write a better script!

Do you really think we would just delete it?

Part of our mission is to expose the porn industry. We are sorry that your daughter got involved in this but, according to you, the porn industry possibly hired her as an underage performer and they deserve to be exposed.

As for your husband being a Principal? Well, YOU told us that Mrs. Rollins. And now you have CONFIRMED it many times.

THIS IS NEWS!!!

THIS IS PARODY!!!

THIS IS SHOCK MEDIA!!!

THIS IS WIKI LEAKS EXPOSE’!!!

THIS IS GOLD!!!

THIS IS YOUR WORST NIGHTMARE!!!”

(Discuss this post here: http://pornwikileaks.com/forum/showthread.php?p=75999)

Free Speech Coalition attempts to silence Porn Wiki Leaks!!!

(Discuss this thread here)

Free Speech Coalition attempts to silence Porn Wiki Leaks!!!

Unbelievable. You heard it right. The Free Speech Coalition is attempting to quiet the voice of Porn Wiki Leaks and shut PWL down. (click link for info)

Free Speech Coalition???

This is the same organization that “supposedly” champions free speech rights and stands behind controversial decisions such as Hustler Magazine vs. Jerry Falwell, the landmark decision that allowed for Larry Flynt’s Hustler Magazine to print it’s “parody” liquor advertisement that had preacher Jerry Falwell talking about the first time he had sex…with his mother!

Hustler's landmark "parody" advertisement

Included in the Supreme Court’s decision were these words:

(from the wikipedia)

“At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one’s mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty – and thus a good unto itself – but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole. We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions.” The First Amendment envisions that the sort of robust political debate that takes place in a democracy will occasionally yield speech critical of public figures who are “intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large”. In New York Times, the Court held that the First Amendment gives speakers immunity from sanction with respect to their speech concerning public figures unless their speech is both false and made with the knowledge of its falsehood or with reckless disregard for the truth of the statement. Although false statements lack inherent value, the “breathing space” that freedom of expression requires in order to flourish must tolerate occasional false statements, lest there be an intolerable chilling effect on speech that does have constitutional value.”

Another law website explains further:

“Hustler Magazine v Falwell considered the constitutionality of a Virginia decision upholding an award against Hustler for publishing a parody advertisement featuring Moral Majority leader, the Rev. Jerry Falwell. The ad in question, a parody of Campari Liquor’s ads running at the time, suggested that Falwell’s first sexual encounter was with his mother in an outhouse. Because no reasonable reader would believe the ad was factual, the award was based on an “intentional infliction of emotional distress” rather than defamation theory. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the jury award violated the First Amendment. The Court saw no principled standard for separating the Hustler ad from, for example, hard-hitting political cartoons.”

If anyone thinks that Monica Foster’s wiki page is ANYTHING but a joke; a critical attack of Fosters agenda to close down Porn Wiki Leaks; they are hugely mistaken. This wiki page was created from a user submitted forum and is protected by free speech and parody laws. Monica Foster is guilty of being and has admitted to being active as a prostitute and therefore is a criminal. For your information, prostitution is still illegal in California. While the staff of Porn Wiki Leaks believes that prostitution should be legal, we and our forum members reserve the right use free speech, parody, and hard hitting commentary in our effort to keep our voice alive.

Monica Foster in turn has made repeated and well documented death threats, legal threats, and has used her race and sex as a form of grandstanding to promote her illegal prostitution efforts.

From shouselaw.com:

“California law clearly states that,

Despite the fact that prostitution is known as the “oldest profession in the world,” it is still prosecuted aggressively as a criminal act. Prostitution, simply put, means to engage in a sexual act in exchange for money or other consideration (that is, other goods or services).

California prostitution law under Penal Code 647(b) PC prohibits,

  • engaging in the act of prostitution, and
  • offering or agreeing to engage in a sexual act (otherwise known as “solicitation”).

There is often an enormous amount of political and social pressure to arrest those involved in prostitution offenses. As a result, law enforcement agencies typically invest substantial resources into vice squad operations.”

All across America parents are standing by as their teenagers and young adults move to Los Angeles to pursue their “15 minutes of fame.” Behind the scenes is a predatory business known as the porn industry, which falsely portrays itself as “a sexier version of Hollywood.”

We at PWL believe that the full picture needs to be put forward:

For example:

1.Do the teenagers and young adults entering porn know that they will be encouraged and often forced to engage in illegal activity such as prostitution once they enter the porn business?
2.Do they know that prostitution is illegal and that charges can mean a permanent criminal record and jail time?
3.Do they know that in the age of Google, anonymity is a thing of the past and that their porn career will follow them their entire lives?
4.Do they know that the current protection of health records in the porn business is a sham?
5.Do they know the many of the male performers in “straight” porn partake in high risk gay activity both in untested HIV positive gay and transsexual porn and gay escort work, therefore causing a high risk of catching HIV themselves?
6.Do they know that prominent agent, Derek Hay, is involved in illegal pimping and pandering activities and will most often coerce his girls into prostitution to supplement his income?
7.Do they know that although HIV is tested for monthly, that no tests are made for HPV, Herpes, Hepatitis C, and many other sexually transmitted diseases? And they are at a high risk for receiving any or all of those STD’s during the course of their career?
8.Do parents and families know what their teenagers and young adults are getting involved in before they stand idly by watching their teenager pursue their “15 minutes of shame?”
9.Are new porn actors healthy enough, emotionally, physically, spiritually and mentally to handle the physical requirements and the onslaught of attention and sexual admiration they will surely receive after their first movies come out?
10.What type of exit strategy has been made for the performer to leave porn and lead a regular life once they have had enough of the sex industry? How will it affect future career plans and goals? How will it affect their social status and level of happiness. Are they emotionally ready to handle porn as a choice?

Pornography has become mainstream in many respects, but the porn world is also a dangerous world that engages in criminal and high risk behavior openly. Much like a high speed car chase, being a porn actor is dangerous. Perhaps there should be more protocols in place to insure performers know what they are getting into, and underage performers are NEVER allowed to get past the front door.

We here at Porn Wiki Leaks LOVE pornography. We would like to see it continue and thrive. But with the gay mafia and Derek Hay’s gay agenda putting many of the straight shooters out of business, all we are left with is a VERY high risk list of male performers and directors and a sham of a health agency that leaves female performers and their straight male counterparts at a very high risk for HIV infection.

Until there is a system that addresses these issues openly and honestly and that includes some form of dialogue about what the gay male crossover talent are doing in their off days and their private lives, PWL will continue to expose the lies of Porn Valley.

"Gay for Pay" crossover performer Criss Strokes

Rather than vilify Porn Wiki Leaks for calling your daughters, your girlfriends, and your porn stars a “hooker” and a “whore,” perhaps you might want to look at the fact that THEY ARE HOOKERS AND WHORES and ask “HOW DID THEY BECAME THAT WAY?” and “WHO TURNED YOUR GIRLS INTO PROSTITUTES?”

Why does the porn industry continue to lie to the girls, telling them they are not “whores” or “hookers?”

Because a huge and very disposable talent base is at risk!

Without the constant influx of young teens entering the porn industry believing it’s a “cool summer job,” porn producers would be left only with the career hookers and strippers that dominated porn in the 80’s and 90’s. The porn industry needs your young girls to feed it’s machine and remain relevant. Long gone are the days when the porn watching public will purchase porn that has only “career whores” and “seasoned pros.” The porn industry NEEDS younger and more innocent girls and LOTS of them to remain in business.

Thinly veiled behind the Free Speech Coalition’s attack of PWL is a voice screaming,

“Don’t scare the talent!”

Perhaps the porn industry, like NASCAR and Drag Racing, is not for Americas teens at all and should be regulated and licensed just like alcohol, tobacco, and firearms?

We at PWL would HATE to see it go that way. But with the high risk “gay agenda” advancing proudly, we suspect that the porn industry will either be SHUT DOWN OR HIGHLY REGULATED.

“We here at Porn Wiki Leaks ask that the porn business be made safe again, and that the people entering the business and the people who give emotional support to family members entering the business, understand fully what they are signing up for.”

From one of our administrators:

“Is Porn Wikileaks responsible for what it is accused of?

The answer is NO and there are many many many reasons why. We are simply a news publishing website that lets people speak freely and openly about the criminals, drug addicts, illegal pimps, gay mafia, hookers and many others in the world of porn that want to try and ruin porn and or risk the safety other others in the business. If anyone would like to post on our website and state their case they are more than welcome and can even have their name or other info removed if they can show that they are not part of one of the above groups.

Just like the real wikileaks or 4chang or many other world famous sites that publish user submitted content we are protected by freedom of speech laws. The fact that the porn industry would like to take our free speech rights away so we can not expose these kinds of scum is shocking. All of what has been said about models on our site from any of the owners or administrators is 100% fact and true and if you feel otherwise you are welcome to challenge it.

The models listed as “Whores” and “Hookers” are whores and hookers and that is how they make their living and if they are not they can simply come here and prove different to have that removed. The gay mafia and the part of the adult industry that supports the gay mafia has tried everything under the sun to shut us up and try and accuse us of doing something illegal and/or wrong but we have done no such thing. The list of names that was given to us has been accused of being stolen from AIM to try and make us look bad and try and shut us down when in fact no one has proven anything came from AIM in the first place and we wouldn’t be liable for posting it even if it did anyways because we just post what people submit. They have tried to accuse us of extortion, and many other things which is 100% false. We have not extorted anyone into doing anything now have we? Didn’t think so.

We have been accused of posting medical records and blood tests which again even if we did we would not be liable for but again we have not posted a single one. We have been accused of posting address’s but again our members post it on Porn Wiki Leaks and this information is always public and freely available through google’s search engine. We have been accused of posting ID’s of models but again our members do this but we have a strict rule that any ID’s must have the models address and ID number blocked out for the safety of the model.

The gay mafia that is speaking on behalf of the adult industry trying to fight us claims to be for the models, but that’s a lie. Our website is all about the safety of the models and cleaning the business up.

For the ones that don’t know why we are here and what the site is about and why it was started let me say this. Porn Wiki Leaks started out as Derekandrewhay.com which is the full legal name of the biggest gay suitcase pimp in Los Angeles that owns LA Direct Models which is his front for his illegal prostitution ring of theluxurycompanion.com and ukbustybabes.com

We are not against the gays but see in gay porn it is not mandatory for blood testing and most of the gay models are “known positives” with HIV. In the straight world of porn everyone gets tested every 28 days and doesn’t like to take the risk that the gay side takes without testing. Just about every HIV breakout in porn for the last 15 years has been from a male model that was jumping the fence including the last break from Cameron Reid aka Derrick Burts.

The gay mafia does not care about anything but their pockets and the people that support the gay mafia like the Free Speech Coalition and Paul Armstrong and his lawyer that are trying to shut us up. See we have a lot of dirt on Paul and what he has been doing, which will be updated in his wiki page very soon, and you will be able to read all about. We get stuff on people everyday that people think was buried in a closet so stay tuned for more.”

And finally, from our message board a reader posted this today:

“Free speech means you have a right to call a whore a whore and say she’s degrading the whole family. Free speech includes the freedom to not be nice. If you can’t call a whore a whore how can you feel free to call a politician a whore? And guess what? The court has ruled over and over again that you CAN call politicians whores.

PWL is frickin’ brilliant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It has managed to turn “free speech advocates” against free speech and used their own arguments against them. THEIR SHOULD BE BOOKS WRITTEN ABOUT THIS. This would make a great PHD dissertation.”

(Discuss this thread here)